ASIC pushes for disqualifications for former James Hardie directors

28 July 2009

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Australia's Business Day has reported that The Australian Securities and Investments Commission ('ASIC') wants seven former non-executive directors and three former executives  at James Hardie banned from company directorships for at least five years each and fined a total of $2.8 million to $3.4 million.

Justice Ian Gzell began hearing submissions on exoneration, penalties and costs this week after finding in April 2009 that ten former executives and directors breached their duties to James Hardie when they approved a misleading company statement about asbestos compensation in February 2001. That outcome saw a number of resignations from high profile Australian boards, as noted on Manifest-I in May.

James Hardie's former managing director Peter Macdonald has agreed with ASIC that he should be fined and banned from company management for his role in the board's approval of the statement . But Mr Macdonald's barrister, David Studdy, SC, suggested a smaller fine and shorter ban than recommended by ASIC. ASIC are seeking a disqualification of 12 to 16 years and a fine of between A$1.47 million and A$1.81 million, whereas his lawyer contends that a disqualification period of five to seven years and a fine in the range of A$200,000 to A$250,000 is more appropriate.

Bans and Penalties Sought by ASIC Director Former Role Disqualification Period Sought Penalty Sought Peter Macdonald Managing Director 12-16 years A$1.47m-A$1.81m Peter Shafron General Counsel 8 years A$320,000-A$450,000 Phillip Morley Chief Financial Officer 6 years A$150,000-A$200,000 Michael Brown, Michael Gillfillan, Meredith Hellicar, Martin Koffel, Dan O'Brien, Greg Terry and Peter Willcox Non-executive directors 5 years A$120,000-A$130,000

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

SEC 2027 examination priorities put fresh focus on proxy advisor oversight

SHareholder meeting

Saba’s Baillie Gifford board challenge falls short, but pressure on trusts likely to persist

SHareholder meeting

ICCR urges investors to encourage company support against Rule 14a-8 rescission proposal

SHareholder meeting

Fifteen financial institutions push ISSB towards dedicated Nature Standard

SHareholder meeting

NA100 benchmark shows nature commitments progress as investors strengthen engagement efforts

SHareholder meeting

ESMA's Transition and Impact Claims Guidance: Lessons for SFDR II

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 United States of America Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

US SEC Rule 14a-8 Rescission Proposal

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Australia’s OpenAI breach

Australia’s OpenAI breach puts AI governance and board oversight under scrutiny

September 25, 2026
Read More

Sustainability reporting requirements boost climate-related financial disclosures, ASIC says

September 23, 2026
Read More
ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations

ASX governance reform: simplification must preserve decision-useful disclosure

September 16, 2026
Read More
Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

August 27, 2026
Read More
APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC corporate governance reforms: Japan and Australia shift focus to governance effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More
Australia’s government

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More