ASIC pushes for disqualifications for former James Hardie directors

28 July 2009

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

Australia's Business Day has reported that The Australian Securities and Investments Commission ('ASIC') wants seven former non-executive directors and three former executives  at James Hardie banned from company directorships for at least five years each and fined a total of $2.8 million to $3.4 million.

Justice Ian Gzell began hearing submissions on exoneration, penalties and costs this week after finding in April 2009 that ten former executives and directors breached their duties to James Hardie when they approved a misleading company statement about asbestos compensation in February 2001. That outcome saw a number of resignations from high profile Australian boards, as noted on Manifest-I in May.

James Hardie's former managing director Peter Macdonald has agreed with ASIC that he should be fined and banned from company management for his role in the board's approval of the statement . But Mr Macdonald's barrister, David Studdy, SC, suggested a smaller fine and shorter ban than recommended by ASIC. ASIC are seeking a disqualification of 12 to 16 years and a fine of between A$1.47 million and A$1.81 million, whereas his lawyer contends that a disqualification period of five to seven years and a fine in the range of A$200,000 to A$250,000 is more appropriate.

Bans and Penalties Sought by ASIC Director Former Role Disqualification Period Sought Penalty Sought Peter Macdonald Managing Director 12-16 years A$1.47m-A$1.81m Peter Shafron General Counsel 8 years A$320,000-A$450,000 Phillip Morley Chief Financial Officer 6 years A$150,000-A$200,000 Michael Brown, Michael Gillfillan, Meredith Hellicar, Martin Koffel, Dan O'Brien, Greg Terry and Peter Willcox Non-executive directors 5 years A$120,000-A$130,000

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

US lawmaker drives for greater transparency at DCSS companies

SHareholder meeting

Disney and ABC sue US FCC over alleged regulatory retaliation

SHareholder meeting

Proxy advisor sues Oklahoma over HB 4429 as legal pressure on voting restrictions mounts

SHareholder meeting

SEC axes Rule 14a-8 ‘no action’ process for shareholder proposals

SHareholder meeting

Investors urge SEC to reject Texas Stock Exchange voting rule

SHareholder meeting

Wise faces shareholder lawsuit soon after controversial US shift

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC corporate governance reforms: Japan and Australia shift focus to governance effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More
Australia’s government

Australia Narrows Climate Reporting Scope Mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

Remuneration Retraction: ANZ Bonuses Pulled Amid Misconduct Scandal

November 11, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

What’s Up Down Under: Australia Peak AGM Season Snapshot

October 29, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Corporate Governance Changes: ASX Approves Overhaul of Principles Process

October 24, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Australian Agendas: Shareholders Gear Up for Peak AGM Season Showdowns

October 7, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More