Disqualifications of James Hardie directors overturned

17 December 2010

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

The NSW Court of Appeal has overturned the decision of the NSW Supreme Court in respect of seven directors who had received bans on serving as directors. The Supreme Court had found that they had breached their duties to the company (James Hardie)  in 2001 over a misleading media release about asbestos compensation.

The Court of Appeal determined that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC") failed to prove that the directors had considered or approved a 2001 draft media release saying a new compensation trust would be ''fully funded''. Three years subsequent to that announcement, it emerged that the trust was in fact underfunded by some A$1.5bn.

As a result of the unanimous Court of Appeal decision, the five year disqualifications and fines handed out to seven former non-executive directors will now not apply. It will also reconsider the bans and fines originally imposed on Peter Shafron (former General Counsel) and Phillip Morley (former CFO). Former CEO Peter MacDonald did not appeal his 15 year disqualification.

The Court of Appeal based its decision on the failure of the ASIC to call as a witness a former partner of one of James Hardie's lawyers who had advised on the setting up of the trust.

However, in a separate decision, the company lost it's appeal against the Supreme Court's ruling that it had breached the Corporations Act by issuing "materially misleading" statements and had made a "flagrant" breach of its continuous disclosure obligations. The Court of Appeal judgment noted that there "could be no doubt about the misleading nature" of the announcement.

Further Reading

Hellicar's board ban overturned - Business Day

Court overturns bans on James Hardie directors - Business Day

The text of the decision is expected to be posted in due course.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

US SEC warning chills investor stewardship

SHareholder meeting

US State officials raise stewardship concerns over Rule 14a-8 rescission

SHareholder meeting

Investment Association calls for hybrid formats in virtual AGM adoption

SHareholder meeting

SEC quorum rules overhaul raises fresh shareholder rights concerns

SHareholder meeting

FCA opts for comply-or-explain climate disclosures in retreat from mandatory reporting

SHareholder meeting

SEC’s Tesla decision risks accelerating retail voting programme adoption

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

2026 Global Proxy Season Review

Minerva Briefing

Global IPOs: Growth, governance and risk

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Australia’s OpenAI breach

Australia’s OpenAI breach puts AI governance and board oversight under scrutiny

September 25, 2026
Read More
Minerva Proxy Update

Minerva Proxy Update: Shareholder voting signals continued executive pay, board accountability focus

September 18, 2026
Read More
ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations

ASX governance reform: simplification must preserve decision-useful disclosure

September 16, 2026
Read More
Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

August 27, 2026
Read More
APAC Corporate Governance Reforms 2026

APAC corporate governance reforms: Japan and Australia shift focus to governance effectiveness

July 22, 2026
Read More
Proxy Voting Review 2026

Minerva proxy update: Governance reforms, vote no campaigns and AGM results

July 3, 2026
Read More