https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0XR6Y9027Qscript>

Sustainable Stewardship Snippet 3: Sustainable to the Core

16 January 2020

Editor

EU regulation

Significant challenges exist for asset stewards in terms of assessing whether pertinent ESG factors have been identified and integrated into the investment process of their asset managers, according to Niall O’Shea from Discern Sustainability.

At Minerva’s recent ESG Educational Event in London, Niall explored the topic of the growth of ESG and Climate Change factor awareness, and looked specifically at how Trustees could have some faith that their investment managers are incorporating these factors at a fundamental level into the investment decision-making process.

Niall set the scene by charting the history of ‘ESG’ as a
topic - covering the rise of SRI and how few people realise that SRI
has been perhaps the ultimate ‘stronger for longer’ theme since 2003, with its
growth not even deflected by, and probably benefitting from, the financial
crisis.

With the majority of empirical studies supporting the claim that investment strategies incorporating ESG factors deliver improved investment metrics, the debate has moved on to not ‘if’ ESG factor integration is required, but ‘how’ it can be achieved in a way that maximises the potential to improve the investment selection and monitoring process.

Niall highlighted one of the key challenges facing asset
managers – that ESG ‘intelligence’, whilst increasing in quantity and range
over time, has not necessarily increased in quality. Most of the information
available is not investment grade, and overall the ESG data is ‘messy’. Against
this background, he offered some thoughts on how Trustees and other asset
stewards might assess how their investment managers are doing in terms of identifying
pertinent ESG factor information and placing it at the core of their investment
selection process:

  • Before the hiring process – ensure that you have consistent messaging and aligned ESG beliefs and behaviours from the top, starting with your SIP;
  • In the selection process – the RFP document that you or your consultant uses should be interrogative and not just ‘box-ticking. What do the Trustees really want to know about the investment process and ESG factors;
  • At the interview stage – move away from any investment examples provided by managers, and ask about ones that are of interest/relevance to you/your Scheme; and
  • After their appointment – be an informed nuisance, continuing to ask questions, and ensuring Trustee training and CPD is ongoing and reflects current thinking.

For more information on how Minerva is helping asset steward
get to grips with their new ESG responsibilities, and stay up to date on latest
developments, say hello@minerva.info

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ISSB sets direction for TNFD-aligned reporting

SHareholder meeting

2026 UK Proxy Season: targeted shareholder dissent yields boardroom fallouts

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SEC plans to dismantle shareholder governance infrastructure

SHareholder meeting

SFDR reset progresses, but credibility gaps remain

SHareholder meeting

China’s 80% ESG rule forces a reset for public funds

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Related Stories

Science Based Targets initiative 2.0

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

June 18, 2026
Read More

Shell AGM update: quiet climate vote sharpens BP contrast

May 27, 2026
Read More

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

May 20, 2026
Read More

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

May 13, 2026
Read More

Texas Climate Investing Blacklist Stays on Ice

April 17, 2026
Read More

FCA Sustainability Disclosure Proposals: A Turning Point for UK Market Transparency

April 10, 2026
Read More