The vexed question of bonuses - is there a better way?

10 December 2009

Sarah Wilson

EU regulation

As shareholders are asked to get more involved with executive pay monitoring, the problem for many investors is how to judge what is reasonable - traditional bonus plans have resulted in plans which are not aligned with performance. Basing bonuses on stock prices exposes them to external factors, including irrational behaviour that can also influence stock prices. Traditional approaches to managing executive pay - bonus caps, shareholder votes nor regulation have, so far, fallen short on aligning shareholder and management interests. So, is there a better way?

According to Dr Hermann Stern and his team at Zurich-based research consultancy, Obermatt there is. Their approach has been to create a bonus index which calculates a "deserved bonus" based on indexed operating performance for public companies and their significant divisions.

Non-indexed bonus plans typically pay excessively high bonuses in up-cycles and bonuses that are too low in downturns. Indexed bonuses have the advantage that they pay appropriate bonuses that are neither too high nor too low. By assessing performance relative to peers, the index measures true operating performance only, not the economy’s performance (external factors such as business cycles, resource price changes, customer demand or market sentiment at the stock exchanges etc.)

Based on the management performance of FTSE 100 companies relative to their global peers, 30% of UK listed companies have underperformed their international competitors. This means that, from a shareholder point of view, performance bonuses may not be justified for a significant minority of top UK companies for 2009. "Our research indicates that FTSE 100 companies are far better than companies listed in Switzerland and Germany where we have conducted the same type of research", says Obermatt CEO Hermann Stern. "70% of the SMI/SPI companies listed in Switzerland and of the DAX 100 companies listed in Germany underperformed their global peers".

Because the bonus index is objectively and transparently defined by an independent third party, Manifest will be incorporating the Obermatt Bonus Index in its comparative remuneration analysis for UK and European Securities for the 2010 proxy season. "We've been very impressed with Dr Stern's work" said Manifest CEO, Sarah Wilson, "Obermatt's quantitative approach is both transparent and objective and puts shareholders and companies on a level playing field. Clearly companies need to attract and retain the best possible talent to generate shareholder returns. But by the same token, shareholders do not want to overpay or pay at the wrong point in the cycle."

The Manifest and Obermatt teams are currently working on integrating data sets to produce the first reports for December 31st year-end companies at the end of Q1 2010.

Links

Obermatt Index Methodology >>

Financial News Coverage >>

Accounting's Contribution to Executive Pay >>

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

FRC’s new regulatory approach signals a shift from rule-making to market stewardship

SHareholder meeting

Shein lists in Hong Kong at reduced valuation after protracted IPO journey

SHareholder meeting

SEC sends executive pay disclosure overhaul to White House for review

SHareholder meeting

Democratic attorneys general defend credit ratings agencies against anti-ESG pressure

SHareholder meeting

Investor coalition urges US EEOC to retain workforce demographic reporting

SHareholder meeting

Australia consults on climate disclosure rollback

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

Shareholder Proposal Voting Trends 2026 H1

Minerva Briefing

Virtual-Only AGMs

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 30 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data and expert insights, enabling them to navigate the intricate and ever-evolving landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

Related Stories

Tesla Trillion: Shareholders Approve Musk’s Significant CEO Pay Award

November 7, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Kier Group: Shareholders oppose to remuneration policy

November 16, 2018

Editor

Read More

High Pay Centre's Fat Cat Day highlights pay gap between UK CEOs and staff

January 5, 2018

Editor

Read More

GVC Holdings shareholders vote heavily against remuneration report

June 23, 2017

Editor

Read More

Morrisons: Remuneration report vote passed narrowly

June 16, 2017

Editor

Read More

US pension funds urge for opposition vote at Mylan over executive pay

June 16, 2017

Editor

Read More