UK Stewardship Code: and then there were two (tiers)

6 August 2017

Editor

EU regulation

The UK's Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has removed its tier three category of asset managers, which suggested they required improvement, in their adherence to its stewardship code.

The FRC launched an assessment in December 2015 of the signatories to the code which was created in 2010. When the results of the assement were announced in November last year, the FRC said 80 asset managers were graded as tier 1 and 40 as tier 3. Tier 3 asset managers were given a period of time to improve their reporting or be removed from the list of code signatories.

The regulator said it engaged with tier 3 signatories and about 20 improved their statements to tier 1 or tier 2 standard, whilst the other half chose to remove themselves from the list of signatories. The Tier 3 category has now been removed. All the service providers, such as Manifest, were rated as tier 1 standard, while asset owners were split into tier 1 and tier 2 categories. Tier 1 asset managers include Fidelity Investments, Aberdeen Asset Management, State Street Global Advisors and Baillie Gifford.  Oxford Capital, Edinburgh Partners, Canada Life Asset Management and Nomura Asset Managers are among the tier 2 asset managers.

Tier 1 signatories are described as providing a good quality and transparent description of their approach to stewardship and explanations of an alternative approach where necessary while tier 2 signatories meet many of the reporting expectations but report less transparently on their approach to stewardship or do not provide explanations where they depart from provisions of the Code. The FRC said these descriptions allow clients to discuss with asset managers their different approaches to stewardship, therefore ensuring they best meet their needs. The FRC added that it would be looking for continuous improvement from Code signatories.

The FRC said the formal consultation on its corporate governance code, being held later this year, would include broad initial questions about its approach to the review of the stewardship code. It will consider how to raise reporting standards and whether the tiers are set at the appropriate level. A detailed consultation on specific changes to the stewardship code will follow in 2018.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Maintains UK Stewardship Code Signatory

SHareholder meeting

South Korea expands reach of ESG disclosure rules

SHareholder meeting

TXSE launches amid looming threats to shareholder rights

SHareholder meeting

Anti-DEI Grant Criteria Blocked by US Judge

SHareholder meeting

US SEC Postpones Shareholder Proposal Process Review

SHareholder meeting

Minerva proxy update: AGM season slows as focus turns to Australia

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Related Stories

Minerva Analytics UK Stewardship Code signatory status

Minerva Maintains UK Stewardship Code Signatory

July 16, 2026
Read More

Stewardship after the 2026 Code: Clarity on purpose, friction in practice

April 29, 2026
Read More

Augmenting Alignment: Investor & Issuer Forum Creates Collaborative Compass

December 19, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Reporting Reinforcement: FRC Issues Stewardship and Remuneration Guidance

November 14, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Strengthening Stewardship: IIGCC Urges Creation of EU-wide Code

August 7, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Definition Downgrade: FRC Reframes Stewardship in 2026 UK Code

June 3, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More