https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-0XR6Y9027Qscript>

Many US state pensions fail to address climate risk in proxy voting

14 February 2025

Elizabeth Pfeuti

EU regulation

Many US state pensions fail to address climate risk in proxy voting

February 14, 2025

While some US state pensions are starting to use proxy voting as an effective risk management tool, too many still fall short in addressing climate-related financial risks in their voting guidelines and practices.

In an assessment of pensions fund’s proxy voting guidelines’ strength in addressing climate- and environment-related financial risks, the Sierra Club report revealed only one pension earned an A grade while two-thirds of the pensions received D or F grades.

The New York State Common Retirement Fund received an A grade for its guidelines, which proactively address the full scope of risk mitigation measures on key systemic risks.

Meanwhile, seven state pension funds, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, received B grades for their strong performance on systemic risk, climate resolutions and climate lobbying resolutions and moderate performance in all other areas.

The report also evaluated proxy voting records on climate-related votes, revealing that eight pension systems from California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Oregon earned A grades, indicating that they are adopting a thorough approach to risk management.

Whereas pension systems in Connecticut and LA Country received B grades while the State of Wisconsin Investment Board and the Washington State Investment Board received C grades.

Of the 32 pension funds assessed, the only pension fund to receive an overall A grade was the Massachusetts Pension Reserves Invesment Management due to its B grade for guidelines, A grade for voting and the availability of its vote record through the Freedom of Information Act.

Nine funds earned B or C grades for having transparent voting records and solid-to-moderate proxy voting guidelines. Fourteen received D or F grades due to transparent voting records but weak-to-poor proxy voting guidelines, resulting in poor outcomes. Eight pensions were given 'incomplete' grades for not disclosing their voting records.

Minerva’s blog focuses on the latest developments in ESG investing and stewardship. Minerva is a global provider of sustainable stewardship solutions with over 25 years of expertise. Minerva empowers investors by providing essential tools, including ESG research and data, enabling them to navigate the intricate landscape of stewardship and proxy voting, whilst ensuring their decisions are well-informed and aligned with sustainable principles.

You can read more of our articles by clicking here.

Latest News

SHareholder meeting

ISSB sets direction for TNFD-aligned reporting

SHareholder meeting

2026 UK Proxy Season: targeted shareholder dissent yields boardroom fallouts

SHareholder meeting

Minerva Proxy Update

SHareholder meeting

SEC plans to dismantle shareholder governance infrastructure

SHareholder meeting

SFDR reset progresses, but credibility gaps remain

SHareholder meeting

China’s 80% ESG rule forces a reset for public funds

Featured Briefings

Minerva Briefing

UK Proxy Season Review 2026

Minerva Briefing

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

Minerva Briefing

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Related Stories

Minerva Proxy Season Review 2026

2026 UK Proxy Season: targeted shareholder dissent yields boardroom fallouts

June 26, 2026
Read More
Shareholder Proposals and AGM

Minerva Proxy Update

June 26, 2026
Read More
Science Based Targets initiative 2.0

SBTi 2.0: From targets to disclosure, and what it means for investors

June 18, 2026
Read More

Minerva Proxy Update

June 12, 2026
Read More
Capitol Building

US lawmakers defend “freedom to invest” in pushback against anti‑ESG pressure

June 11, 2026
Read More
EU regulation

EU Inc: simplification, but at what cost for investor protection?

June 10, 2026
Read More